Puriton Parish Council > print this page Print this page


Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Puriton Parish Council Forum » Puriton Parish Council » The Parish Council » Huntspill Wind Farm (s)

Huntspill Wind Farm (s) Options
Previous Topic · Next Topic
the writer
Posted: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 5:36:01 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/29/2009
Posts: 32
Points: 102
You may all be interested in these sites : -

http://www.ecotricity.co.uk/wind-parks/black-ditch-somerset

and

http://www.huntspillwindfarm.co.uk

In the interests of balance these give both sides of the arguement.

My personal opinion ?

Well, Micah Clarke features the Battle of Sedgemoor, and the 'Black Ditch' they refer to was part of Langmoor Rhyne (now replaced by Chedzoy New Rhyne) which caused the rebels to come to grief trying to cross it. Rather a long way, and the wrong side of the Poldens, from the proposed wind farm site

(although if we believe the opponent's view the things are so big you could probably see them peeking over the top of the hills !)

Do I believe the person who has a personal interest at stake, and has obviously done a lot of research, or the PR company contracted to "whistle up the kilts" of the local yokels for a massive fee courtesy of some misguided Green Grant ?

Answers on a £5 note please to " No S*** Sherlock, C/O The Puriton Inn "
Back to top
 
kostar
Posted: Friday, January 29, 2010 9:19:46 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/21/2009
Posts: 8
Points: 30
Location: Puriton
Instead of the convoluted comment just say what you mean.
Back to top
 
the writer
Posted: Sunday, January 31, 2010 4:06:29 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/29/2009
Posts: 32
Points: 102
Its not so much fun that way !
Back to top
 
Merlin
Posted: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:33:24 PM
Rank: Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/13/2009
Posts: 17
Points: 51
Location: Puriton
Regarding wind turbines in any area sorry I do not find them a beauty on the eye I fail to see the need in an area already served by sufficient generation and If they were not subsidised by government grants nobody would show the slightest interest in developing them, if theres too much wind they are braked and not enough speaks for itself. I can see both sides of the argument but this is my personal opinion...not on anyones doorstep please.
Back to top
 
the writer
Posted: Thursday, April 01, 2010 4:09:05 PM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/29/2009
Posts: 32
Points: 102
I would agree and actually go one step further - if there was less time spent banging on about nuclear energy by blinkered anti's and more time spent nailing the nuclear developers to double up on sustainable power by way of 106 agreements i.e. making them build a barrage across the river at Dunball which would also carry a bridge hence putting traffic away from Bridgwater and Cannington at the same time as generating free power from the tide thus reducing the dependence on nuclear in the long run we would be laughing and would need LESS nuclear stations. We could have made the nuclear companies pay to make themselves redundant in the long term AND we would also have a decent road system to support development and also tourism.
As it is because of dithering do gooders etc we now need power generation quick and the only way to do this is either nuclear or fossil fuel. Those eejits back in the 80's won the battle over Hinkley C but lost the war. I don't overly agree with nuclear but at least would like to think that in 10 years time when I switch on my lights in the middle of winter they come on ! This would have happened with tide turbines, and similar campaigns carried out over the last 20 years.
Wind generation does not work especially when you think that over the coldest part of this winter it was virtually flat calm. That is what happens - a high pressure system locks the cold in - it isn't rocket science !
Anyone care to argue the point ?
Back to top
 
Juliet
Posted: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:29:46 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/3/2010
Posts: 4
Points: 12
Location: West Huntspill
The majority of people living within the area local to the proposed Wind Turbines on the Somerset Levels appear to be opposed to the location of the Wind Farms.

They are not opposed to Wind Turbines, however, the general feeling is that Wind Turbines are better sited at Sea where they are far more efficient or within Industrial Areas, such as Avonmouth, where they are more in keeping with other tall structures close by.

Roads will have to be built across green fields to allow access to the sites for delivery of the Turbines components and the materials for the bases on which these gigantic Industrial structures will stand.
It takes over 1,000 tons of concrete and steel to construct the base for EACH Turbine.

Not all roads and bridges within our area have been made to withstand such extreme, heavy construction traffic.

All of this is bound to affect our extremely delicate drainage system.

Once constructed, we will have the Wind Turbines for the next 25 years.
At the end of this time, will the companies building them still be around to take responsibility for restoring the ground to its original state?
Thousands of tons of concrete and steel will need to be removed and disposed of.
This will be an extremely costly process.
Will the companies involved still be willing to take responsibility for such a costly procedure when they are no longer receiving Government subsidies and grants?

House prices in the vicinity of the Wind Turbines will be devalued.
There is NO compensation available to offset this personal financial loss.

The vibrations given off by Wind Turbines have been proved to make people physically ill.
Quote-Windfarm Victims.org .uk
Many (though not all) people who live near Industrial Wind Farms suffer sleep problems, headaches, dizziness, unsteadiness, nausea, exhaustion, anxiety, anger, irritability, depression, memory loss, eye problems, problems with concentration and learning, tinnitus (ringing in ears.)
According to a report by Dr Geoff Leventhall, a fellow of the Institute of Physics and Institute of Acoustics,
‘Low frequency noise causes extreme distress to a number of people who are sensitive to its effects.’

All things considered I think that we do all have a right to be concerned about the long term effects and impacts that these enormous Industrial Machines will have upon our lives and the environment and area within which we live.



Back to top
 
helloworld
Posted: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 1:10:48 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/7/2010
Posts: 3
Points: 6
Juliet wrote:
Roads will have to be built across green fields to allow access to the sites for delivery of the Turbines components and the materials for the bases on which these gigantic Industrial structures will stand.
It takes over 1,000 tons of concrete and steel to construct the base for EACH Turbine.

Not all roads and bridges within our area have been made to withstand such extreme, heavy construction traffic.


From what I can see of the plans, the turbine's location will be the other side of Pawlett tip (here's a map with their location marked - http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&source=s_d&saddr=51.194137,-2.991629&daddr=&hl=en&geocode=&mra=dme&mrcr=0&mrsp=0&sz=14&sll=51.192685,-2.975321&sspn=0.03846,0.077162&ie=UTF8&ll=51.190695,-2.985106&spn=0.038462,0.077162&t=h&z=14 )

Construciton of the site won't have much of an impact. It looks to be very close to the A38 and doesn't look like new major access roads will be required.

Quote:

All things considered I think that we do all have a right to be concerned about the long term effects and impacts that these enormous Industrial Machines will have upon our lives and the environment and area within which we live.


I'm a bit sceptical about how much impact it actually will have on Puriton. I can understand if they were being placed, for example, on the old ROF site but I can't see their location being that much of a problem. Think about it... we are going to have Pawlett tip between us and them which has huge machinery working on it everyday, along with the noise and smell, but that doesn't seem to be an issue for (the majority) of people living in the village.

However, I'm talking from a Puriton perspective here and I can understand if you live in a village closer to the developments.

I'm a bit annoyed that I missed the meeting since it seems that the vast majority are against the plans and I wonder if i'm missing something.
Back to top
 
MOG
Posted: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 2:28:26 PM
Rank: Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/6/2009
Posts: 13
Points: 57
Location: Puriton
helloworld wrote:
Juliet wrote:
Roads will have to be built across green fields to allow access to the sites for delivery of the Turbines components and the materials for the bases on which these gigantic Industrial structures will stand.
It takes over 1,000 tons of concrete and steel to construct the base for EACH Turbine.

Not all roads and bridges within our area have been made to withstand such extreme, heavy construction traffic.


From what I can see of the plans, the turbine's location will be the other side of Pawlett tip (here's a map with their location marked - http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&source=s_d&saddr=51.194137,-2.991629&daddr=&hl=en&geocode=&mra=dme&mrcr=0&mrsp=0&sz=14&sll=51.192685,-2.975321&sspn=0.03846,0.077162&ie=UTF8&ll=51.190695,-2.985106&spn=0.038462,0.077162&t=h&z=14 )

Construciton of the site won't have much of an impact. It looks to be very close to the A38 and doesn't look like new major access roads will be required.

Quote:

All things considered I think that we do all have a right to be concerned about the long term effects and impacts that these enormous Industrial Machines will have upon our lives and the environment and area within which we live.


I'm a bit sceptical about how much impact it actually will have on Puriton. I can understand if they were being placed, for example, on the old ROF site but I can't see their location being that much of a problem. Think about it... we are going to have Pawlett tip between us and them which has huge machinery working on it everyday, along with the noise and smell, but that doesn't seem to be an issue for (the majority) of people living in the village.

However, I'm talking from a Puriton perspective here and I can understand if you live in a village closer to the developments.

I'm a bit annoyed that I missed the meeting since it seems that the vast majority are against the plans and I wonder if i'm missing something.


I think you are missing something - there are TWO proposed developments. You mention the one at West Huntspill not having much impact on Puriton, but the one which will have an impact is for up to nine turbines at Withy End Farm. This development lies immediately to the south of the River Huntspill, bounded to the east by Woolavington Causeway and to the west by the M5. It is just one kilometre from Puriton.

The comment about roads being built across fields is true and is mentioned in EDFs scoping document.
Back to top
 
helloworld
Posted: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 2:48:14 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/7/2010
Posts: 3
Points: 6
MOG wrote:

I think you are missing something - there are TWO proposed developments. You mention the one at West Huntspill not having much impact on Puriton, but the one which will have an impact is for up to nine turbines at Withy End Farm. This development lies immediately to the south of the River Huntspill, bounded to the east by Woolavington Causeway and to the west by the M5. It is just one kilometre from Puriton.

The comment about roads being built across fields is true and is mentioned in EDFs scoping document.


Thanks for the extra information. I presumed the sites were going to be close to each other on the other side of the M5.

Food for thought...
Back to top
 
MOG
Posted: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 5:25:34 PM
Rank: Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/6/2009
Posts: 13
Points: 57
Location: Puriton
Here's a bit more food for thought everyone - the height of these things is 121 metres or just under 400 feet. That's including the highest point reached by the tip of the blades.

Brent Knoll, our very own prominent landmark, is 137 metres high or about 445 feet.

So these things will be only 52 feet lower than the top of Brent Knoll!
Back to top
 
the writer
Posted: Saturday, April 10, 2010 11:32:51 AM
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/29/2009
Posts: 32
Points: 102
To give everyone some idea, planning has been applied for a wind testing mast to go in - this will be some 70m high or just over half the height of the finished product. When it goes up picture it doubled, and much larger in girth etc with huge great big rotors. Then multiply it by the number of turbines proposed - get the picture ? One massive eyesore droning away (assuming there is enough wind!)
Back to top
 
Juliet
Posted: Monday, May 17, 2010 7:50:29 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/3/2010
Posts: 4
Points: 12
Location: West Huntspill
Are UK Lives So Inferior?

A number of European countries are insisting that Wind Farms can only be located at least 2 kilometres from any human habitation and France imposes a no go area of 500 meters around wind farms.

Many of the properties set within the immediate area to the wind turbines proposed by Ecotricity for Black Ditch, West Huntspill and EDF Energy for Withy Grove, East Huntspill, will be situated much closer to the proposed Wind Turbines than is recommended and considered safe by many European countries.

All of West Huntspill and Pawlett and much of Puriton, East Huntspill and Woolavington will be less than 2 kilometers from the nearest proposed Turbine.

Are UK lives and quality of life inferior to other parts of Europe?

As more Turbines are built, more accidents occur and recorded statistics prove this with a general upwards trend in accident numbers over the past 10 years.

By far the biggest numbers of incidents found are due to blade failure. “Blade Failure” can arise from a number of possible sources and result in either whole blades or pieces of blade being thrown from the Turbine.

Pieces of blade are documented as travelling over 1300metres in Germany; blade pieces have gone through roofs and walls of nearby buildings.

Why is there not a minimum distance of at least 2 kilometres between Turbines and occupied housing in this country, in line with other European countries, so as to adequately address public safety and other issues including noise and shadow flicker?

Why is the safety of the British Public of so little importance that regulations regarding the safe distance of Turbines are ignored?

Quote National Wind Watch-05-01-09

“On Saturday night an Ecotricity wind turbine at their Fen Farm site in Conisholme, North Lincolnshire, suffered catastrophic failure in freezing conditions.

Two huge blades were severely damaged after apparently making contact with the tower. One blade fell to the ground, only after shedding large pieces of debris from height over a wide area.

The base of the tower now shows signs of a major impact as the blade smashed through the entrance structure at ground level before rolling into the neighbouring field.”

These issues around Wind Turbine safety in cold weather are not new.

In December 2008 potentially lethal ice was thrown from blades at Whittlesey.

Please consider carefully the real problems over safety that Wind Turbines have, when sited too close to houses to be safe.

Are UK lives and quality of life really so inferior to other parts of Europe?

Julie and Brian




Back to top
 
Juliet
Posted: Monday, June 28, 2010 9:22:20 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/3/2010
Posts: 4
Points: 12
Location: West Huntspill

Local residents have been given a misleading picture of how the wind farm proposed for ‘The Huntspills’ will look.

Photomontage’s provided by Ecotricity to date, show various views of the site, however, these have all been taken from advantageous points i.e. either an elevated position such as Puriton Hill or from a considerable distance away.

These photomontages will not show the true scale of how these huge industrial machines will dominate the landscape and people living nearby.

I would like to question why Ecotricity have not created a photomontage taken at base level, from properties within the immediate area, such as Huntspill River Bridge on the A38, Withy Road, West Huntspill and Puriton Road River Bridge?

It is obvious that when taken from elevated positions the photomontages created will show a more sympathetic view, whereas, in reality, it will not be unlike living under the ‘Alien Invaders’ from H G Well’s ‘War of the Worlds.’

Due to the large financial benefits they stand to gain, there is a seemingly headlong rush by companies and landowners to install wind turbines in any available position, regardless of the impact on Quality of Life, The Environment and Local Wildlife.
Therefore, although you may not be directly affected by the proposed Huntspill Wind Farms, beware; Turbines may soon be coming to a field by you.

Back to top
 
Users browsing this topic
Guest

Puriton Parish Council Forum » Puriton Parish Council » The Parish Council » Huntspill Wind Farm (s)


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

SoClean Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.168 seconds.

Watch this topic
RSS Feed
Email this topic
Print this topic
Threaded
Normal


Copyright 2008 Puriton Parish Council | All Rights Reserved | Privacy & Security Policy

Puriton Parish Council is powered by:
InTouch with Communities